GB/T 33136-2016 in English
SUPERSEDEDInformation technology service - Data center service capacity maturity model
- Issued on:2016-10-13
- Implemented on:2017-05-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$592.00
《GB/T 33136-2016信息技术服务 数据中心服务能力成熟度模型》由TC28(全国信息技术标准化技术委员会)归口,TC28SC40(全国信息技术标准化技术委员会信息技术服务分会)执行,主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。
Introduction
Analysis of the Standard Core Framework
| Capability Domain | Weight | Core Capability Subdomain |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic Development | 20% | Strategic Control, Inheritance and Innovation, Steady Development |
| Operational Assurance | 60% | 5 subdomains including routine management, service support and service delivery |
| Organizational Governance | 20% | Governance Structure, Organizational Risk, Driving Mechanism |
Key points for implementing maturity levels
The standard divides maturity into five levels:
- Starting level (Level 1): sporadic management activities, only basic capabilities such as duty/operation meet the standards
- Development level (Level 2): Establish process management, standardize key capabilities such as event/problem management
- Steady level (Level 3): Form a complete operating system, and fully implement supplier management/risk management
- Excellent level (Level 4): Introduce quantitative analysis, and achieve standardization of strategic management/innovation management
- Excellent level (Level 5): Continuously optimize mechanisms to drive business innovation
Key Capability Implementation Cases
IT Service Continuity Management
Typical Implementation Process:
- Requirements Analysis: Determine RTO/RPO indicators and identify key business systems
- Strategy Formulation: Design a disaster recovery architecture (such as three centers in two locations)
- Plan Development: Includes three stages: emergency response, system recovery, and business switchback
- Drill Verification: Conduct a full-process drill at least once a year to fix plan defects
Evaluation Index System
| Evaluation Dimensions | Weights | Key Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Process effectiveness | 33% | Process coverage, KPI compliance rate |
| Technical suitability | 12% | Tool integration, automation level |
| Policy completeness | 10% | Institutional norms, operational guidelines |
Value of standard application
The standard:
- Establishes a unified capability evaluation scale to solve the problem of different industry evaluation standards
- Provides a gradual improvement path to clarify the key capability requirements for each maturity level
- Integrate the advantages of international models such as CMMI/COBIT to form a localized practice framework
Typical implementation cycle: initial assessment (January-February) → gap analysis (January) → improvement implementation (March-June) → re-evaluation and certification

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

GB/T 44601-2024 in English
Information technology service—Service life cycle processes
2024-09-29 -

GB/T 25000.1-2021 in English
Systems and software engineering-Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-Part 1:Guide to SQuaRE
2021-04-30 -

GB/T 8566-2022 in English
Systems and software engineering—Software life cycle processes
2022-10-12 -

GB/T 32904-2016 in English
Specification for Quantitative Evaluation of Software Quality
2016-08-29 -

GB/T 38634.5-2024 in English
Systems and software engineering—Software testing—Part 5:Keyword-driven testing
2024-10-26 -

GB/T 46900-2025 in English
Systems and software engineering—General technical requirements for low-code development platform
2025-12-31 -

GB/T 33136-2024 in English
Information technology service—Service capability maturity model for data center
2024-12-31 -

GB/T 25507-2010 in English
Industry foundation classes platform
2010-12-01 -

GB/T 15532-2008 in English
Specification of computer software testing
2008-04-11 -

GB/T 16680-2015 in English
Systems and software engineering―Requirements for managers of user documentation
2015-12-31