Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
video monitoring secure system scopethis standard hand feeling method ec test method
GB/T 37688-2019 in English

GB/T 37688-2019 in English

VALID

Information technology—Measurement of re-flowabledocument interoperability

  • Issued on:2019-08-30
  • Implemented on:2020-03-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $220.00
$214.00
Standard No: GB/T 37688-2019
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Information technology—Measurement of re-flowabledocument interoperability
Title in Chinese: 信息技术 流式文档互操作性的度量
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2019-08-30
Implemented on: 2020-03-01
ICS Classification: 35.240.20-IT applications in office work
Chinese Classification: L76-Text preparation and communication
Professional Classification: GB-National Standard
Related Topics: operability
streaming xi technology
Streaming document definition
streaming document
equivalent operation
Flow instrument operation
Flow experiment operation
Flow Calibration How-To
degree measurement information
interoperability in english
Mass flow operation
Flowing Documents vs. Typographic Documents
Flow Fluorescence Operation
Basic operation of streaming technology
Flow Document Layout Documentation
Flow Mapping
Streaming c6 software operation
Active
The principle of streaming technology
Spectral Cytometry
Flow Instrument Operation
GBT37688

《GB/T 37688-2019信息技术 流式文档互操作性的度量》由TC28(全国信息技术标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。


Introduction

National Standard of the People's Republic of China GB/T 37688—2019 Interpretation: Measurement of Interoperability of Streaming Documents

I. Introduction

With the rapid development of information technology, streaming documents are increasingly used in the fields of office and publishing. However, the interoperability issues between different document formats have gradually become prominent, seriously affecting the efficiency of information sharing and collaboration. GB/T 37688—2019 standard came into being, aiming to provide a scientific measurement method and framework for the interoperability of streaming documents. This standard applies to the activities of stream document writers and users in document creation, editing, modification and review during the document life cycle.

II. Background and significance of the standard

This standard was proposed and coordinated by the National Technical Committee for Information Technology Standardization, and the main drafting units include Beijing Information Science and Technology University, China Electronics Technology Standardization Institute and other authoritative institutions. The formulation of the standard is based on the following backgrounds:

  • Coexistence of multiple document formats: There are currently a variety of streaming document format standards, such as UOF, OOXML, ODF, etc., and the interoperability issues between these formats need to be resolved urgently.
  • Complex and diverse functional points: The functional point definitions of different formats are not exactly the same, resulting in information loss or deformation during the conversion process.
  • Diversified user needs: Users need to switch freely between different document formats while keeping the content and style intact and consistent.

III. Interoperability classification and measurement model

Classification dimension Document format interoperability Document instance interoperability Interoperability level
Function point mapping capability Full mapping capability of function points between formats Compatibility of instance function points in target format Good, average, poor
Conversion complexity Difficulty of function point conversion based on format characteristics Conversion feasibility based on instance function points -

IV. Interoperability measurement model detailed explanation

4.1 Conceptual layer and parameter layer analysis

The conceptual layer describes the document function points and their relationships, forming a tree structure. For example:

  • Word processing document: contains metadata, chapters, paragraphs and other sub-function points.
  • Spreadsheet document: contains worksheet, row, column and other sub-function points.
  • Spreadsheet document: contains worksheet, row, column and other sub-function points.
  • 4.1 Conceptual layer and parameter layer analysis

    The conceptual layer describes the document function points and their relationships, forming a tree structure. For example:

    • Word processing document: contains metadata, chapter, paragraph and other sub-function points.
    • Spreadsheet document: contains worksheet, row, column ...

    4.2 Importance and Convertibility of Function Points

    The Importance (DI) and Convertibility (DT) of Function Points are the core parameters of interoperability assessment:

    Attributes DI Importance Rating DT Conversion Difficulty Rating
    DI Rating
    • 1 (required): such as the title and author in metadata.
    • 0.6 (common): such as the first line indent value of a paragraph.
    • 0.3 (rarely used): such as the absolute value after a paragraph.
    • 1: fully convertible, no information loss.
    • 0.6: Partially retained, with complex mapping relationships.
    • 0.3: Difficult to convert or unable to map.

V. Interoperability Measurement Methods and Application Recommendations

5.1 Application Grading Assessment

According to the interoperability level, users can adopt different strategies:
  • Good interoperability: Supports complex function point conversion, recommended.
  • General interoperability: Some functions are limited, and careful evaluation is required.
  • Poor interoperability: Key functions cannot be retained, and it is recommended to avoid use.

5.2 Implementation Recommendations

To improve document interoperability, the following measures are recommended:
  • Prefer formats with high compatibility: such as open standards such as ODF.
  • Optimize function point design: avoid using function points with low DT values.
  • Regularly evaluate interoperability: ensure the overall compatibility of the document set.

VI. Case Analysis and References

Appendix A shows in detail the interoperability application cases of OOXML and UOF formats. The effectiveness and practicality of the model are verified through function point comparison and DT value calculation. As shown in Figure A.1, the choice of the instance document on the function point paragraph border and sentence border has a significant impact on the interoperability results.


References

  1. ISO/IEC 26300: Open document format standard for office applications.
  2. ISO/IEC 29500: Document description and processing language - XML format standard for open office documents.
  3. ISO/IEC PDTR 29166: ODF/OOXML conversion guide.

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 37688-2019
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend