GB/T 39077-2020 in English
SUPERSEDEDTest methods for detecting detrimental phases in lean duplex austenitic-ferritic stainless steels
- Issued on:2020-09-29
- Implemented on:2021-04-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$340.00
《GB/T 39077-2020经济型奥氏体-铁素体双相不锈钢中有害相的检测方法》由TC183(全国钢标准化技术委员会)归口,TC183SC16(全国钢标准化技术委员会特殊钢分会)执行,主管部门为中国钢铁工业协会。
Introduction
Interpretation of the core content of the standard
This standard designs three types of harmful phase detection methods for economical austenite-ferrite duplex stainless steel:
| Detection method | Applicable scenarios | Key parameters | Judgment criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microstructure inspection method | Production/welding/in-service inspection | Phase boundary percentage P value | Series I (P≤2%~70%) Series II (P≤2%~70%) |
| Charpy impact test method | Toughness assessment | Impact absorption energy KV2 | Group A ≥ 70J Group B ≥ 100J |
| Ferric chloride corrosion test method | Corrosion resistance evaluation | Corrosion rate mdd | Group A ≤ 10mdd Group B ≤ 10mdd |
Analysis of key technical points
1. Microstructure inspection method
The distribution of harmful phases was observed under a 500-1000x microscope using the electrolytic etching technology (oxalic acid/sodium hydroxide solution). Note:
- Deduct the influence of twin boundaries
- The arbitration adopts the average value of five fields of view
- The weldment needs to select the rating chart according to the weld PREN value
2. Charpy impact test method
The sample preparation strictly follows GB/T229, with special attention:
- Full-size samples are preferred, and small sizes need to be negotiated
- The notch position of the weldment is implemented in accordance with GB/T2650
- Re-inspection rules: The single value can be 70% lower than the limit, but the average value must meet the standard
3. Ferric chloride corrosion test method
Key control points:
- The sample surface Ra≥0.8μm and pickling is prohibited
- Solution ratio: 5%FeCl3+1%NaNO3
- The temperature is strictly controlled at 25℃±1℃
Implementation suggestions
Case 1: Welding process evaluation
It is recommended to use microstructure + Charpy impact combined testing: first determine the P value through metallography, and then verify whether the impact toughness meets the corresponding relationship in Appendix C.
Case 2: In-service equipment testing
Microstructure inspection method is preferred, and portable hardness tester can be used to assist in judgment for parts that cannot be sampled (need to establish a corresponding relationship between hardness and P value).
Analysis of Standard Evolution
This standard innovatively:
- Established a testing system for economical dual-phase steel for the first time
- Introduced a quantitative indicator of the percentage of phase boundary content P
- Associated the PREN value grouping with the testing method
Compared with ISO/ASTM standards, it adds differentiated requirements for 20Cr type A/B group, which is more in line with the actual application of materials in China.

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

GB/T 40404-2021 in English
Slag material—Measurement of melting temperature—High temperature metallographic method
2021-08-20 -

GB/T 224-2019 in English
Determination of the depth of decarburization of steels
2019-06-04 -

GB/T 36165-2018 in English
Determination of average grain size of metal—Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)method
2018-05-14 -

GB/T 6394-2017 in English
Metal - Methods for estimating the average grain size
2017-03-03 -

GB/T 30067-2013 in English
Standard Terminology Relating to Metallography
2013-12-17 -

GB/T 15711-2018 in English
Inspection of non-metallic inclusions of steel—Etching test method of tower samples
2018-05-14 -

GB/T 13298-2015 in English
Inspection methods of microstructure for metals
2015-09-11