GB/T 40947-2021 in English
VALIDGuide for safety resilient city evaluation
- Issued on:2021-11-26
- Implemented on:2022-05-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$476.00
《GB/T 40947-2021安全韧性城市评价指南》由TC351（全国公共安全基础标准化技术委员会）归口，主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。
Introduction
Analysis of the core content of the standard
| Evaluation dimensions | First-level indicators | Number of second-level indicators | Key characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| People safety resilience | 4 items | 12 items | Covering population structure, medical insurance, education level, etc. |
| Facility safety resilience | 5 items | 18 items | Including building earthquake resistance, lifeline projects, emergency shelters, etc. |
| Management safety resilience | 6 items | 21 items | Involving monitoring and early warning, emergency response, financial investment, etc. |
Detailed explanation of key technical indicators
Quantitative indicator calculation case
Number of health technicians per 10,000 people = Total number of health technicians (people) / Total number of permanent residents in the city (10,000 people). This indicator directly reflects the city's medical emergency support capabilities. The standard requires that developed coastal cities should not be less than 65 people per 10,000 people.
Key points for the implementation of qualitative evaluation
For qualitative indicators such as urban earthquake and disaster prevention planning, a four-level scoring method is adopted: A level (90-100 points) requires full compliance with the GB50413 standard and significant implementation effects; D level (below 60 points) refers to major defects.
Background of Standard Evolution
This standard responds to the 11th indicator of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, integrates the ISO22300 resilient city concept, and innovatively proposes the following safety pain points in China's urbanization process:
- For the first time, a three-level evaluation indicator system for safe and resilient cities is clarified
- Innovatively introduces new indicators such as the intelligent monitoring and management rate of municipal pipelines and networks
- Establish an evaluation method that combines quantitative (30 items) and qualitative (26 items) evaluation
Implementation Suggestions
- It is recommended to establish a cross-departmental joint working group to integrate data from emergency management, housing and construction, health and other departments
- Give priority to the transformation of weak safety areas and control the land development intensity to a warning line of no more than 30%
- Use Internet of Things technology to improve>Lifeline Project Monitoring coverage to over 85%
- Carry out third-party evaluation every three years, focusing on changes in key indicators such as the disaster-related death rate per million people
Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-
GB/T 44483-2024 in English
Security and resilience—Vocabulary
2024-09-29 -
GB/T 33170.1-2016 in English
Safety requirements for large-scale activities―Part 1:Safety assessment
2016-10-13 -
GB/T 37230-2018 in English
Societal security—Emergency management—Guidelines for colour coded alerts
2018-12-28 -
GB/T 43392-2023 in English
Safety performance test and assessment method for metro disaster prevention system
2023-11-27 -
GB/T 45426-2025 in English
Security and resilience—Emergency management—Guidelines for the use of social media in emergencies
2025-02-28
