GB/T 44733-2024 in English
VALIDEvaluation indicators for national forest village
- Issued on:2024-10-26
- Implemented on:2024-10-26
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
$262.00
| Standard No: | GB/T 44733-2024 |
| Document status: | VALID |
| Title in English: | Evaluation indicators for national forest village |
| Title in Chinese: | 国家森林乡村评价指标 |
| Language: | English |
| File Format: | Electronic (PDF) |
| Delivery: | Via email within 1~3 business days |
| Issued on: | 2024-10-26 |
| Implemented on: | 2024-10-26 |
| ICS Classification: | 65.020.01-Farming and forestry in general |
| Chinese Classification: | B64-Forest management technology |
| Professional Classification: | GB-National Standard |
| Related Topics: | village
country evaluation rural country scene |
《GB/T 44733-2024国家森林乡村评价指标》由TC385（全国营造林标准化技术委员会）归口，主管部门为国家林草局。
Introduction
Overview of the National Forest Village Evaluation Index System
The National Forest Village Evaluation Index System consists of 6 first-level indicators and 23 second-level indicators, aiming to promote rural ecological protection and green development through scientific evaluation methods. The standard combines ecological protection, improvement of human settlement environment and green industry development, providing an important reference for the realization of rural revitalization strategy.
Background of Standard Formulation
With the in-depth promotion of ecological civilization construction, the National Forest Village Evaluation System came into being. The standard was proposed by the State Forestry and Grassland Administration, combining local practical experience with international advanced concepts, aiming to provide unified technical specifications for rural greening and beautification.
Technical Evolution Analysis
This standard has been optimized and upgraded on the basis of the original forest city construction, and new dimensions such as green industry development and ecological cultural inheritance have been added. At the same time, modern evaluation methods such as GIS technology and big data analysis have been introduced to ensure the scientificity and accuracy of the evaluation results.
Indicator System Comparison
| Indicator Dimension | Secondary Indicator | Evaluation Criteria | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological Protection and Human Living Environment | Rural Style, Natural Landscape | In line with the natural geographical pattern, reasonable spatial layout | 30% |
| Rural Greening | Surrounding Greening, Public Green Space | Coverage rate meets the standard, distinctive landscape characteristics | 25% |
| Abandoned land greening | No bare land, comprehensive ecological restoration | - | |
| Green industry | Increase people's income, Development of characteristic industries | Form a sustainable industrial chain and drive farmers to get rich | 20% |
| - | Establish ecological tourism routes or forest health care bases | - |
Implementation suggestions
Case analysis: A certain region significantly increased the village green coverage rate by introducing native tree species and scientific greening configuration. It is recommended that local governments focus on the following points during implementation:
- Strengthen the construction of grassroots management and protection teams
- Improve the incentive mechanism and encourage public participation
- Pay attention to the balance between ecological protection and economic development
Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
