GH/T 1350-2021 in English

VALID

Guidelines for service ability evaluation of specialized service provider of agricultural means of production and agricultural technology

Issued on:2021-11-08
Implemented on:2022-01-01
File Format:PDF
Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days

Price(USD)： $250.00
$243.00

Standard No:	GH/T 1350-2021
Document status:	VALID
Title in English:	Guidelines for service ability evaluation of specialized service provider of agricultural means of production and agricultural technology
Title in Chinese:	农资农技社会化服务主体服务能力评价指南
Language:	English
File Format:	Electronic (PDF)
Delivery:	Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on:	2021-11-08
Implemented on:	2022-01-01
Related Keywords:	service ability evaluation first composite service evaluation framework evaluation indicator system specialized service provider agricultural technology introduction
Related Topics:	main body Service capabilities Ability Evaluation Service Standard Service Ability Carrier Technology Services Service capabilities overall service capability Evaluation Guidelines secretory service Agricultural resources gravity service Socialization Ability Evaluation GH 2 gh/t Streaming Service Prices first-class social services May Day Agricultural Materials Evaluation Guidelines social services Arabidopsis Transformation Services Agricultural social services greenhouse construction services Service capability evaluation Server Resource Metrics Standard Guidelines for the Construction of Agricultural Socialized Service Standard System User experience service capability evaluation Peanut Machinery Social Services gh/t 1161

Introduction

Analysis of the core content of the standard

GH/T 1350-2021 has constructed an evaluation system with 5 dimensions and 42 specific indicators, and adopts a combination of quantitative scoring on a percentage basis and qualitative grading to scientifically evaluate the service capabilities of entities such as agricultural enterprises and professional cooperatives.

Evaluation indicator system architecture

Evaluation dimensions	Core indicator examples	Weight ratio	Data source
Basic qualities	Entity type, net assets, years of service	15-25%	Industrial and commercial registration/financial audit
Professional skills	Technical personnel qualifications, number of patents, standard setting	30-40%	Professional title certificate/intellectual property certificate
Operational status	Service scale, revenue and profit, rewards and awards	20-30%	Business statements/government disclosures

Key technical points

1. Dynamic scoring algorithm

The comprehensive score is calculated using a standardized formula: S_i = (∑ indicator score/∑ indicator full score) × 100, where the technical staff score introduces the professional experience coefficient (0.2×actual years, upper limit 2 times).

2. Comparison of grading rules

Grading method	Applicable scenarios	Example threshold
Relative level grading	Comparison of entities of the same type in the same region	The top 20% are grade A
Absolute level grading	Cross-regional standardized evaluation	≥90 points are grade A

Implementation suggestions

1. Data collection strategy

Government department registered data (such as market supervision and agricultural department registration information) should be used as the priority
Third-party audit reports are used as the basis for financial data verification
Establish a mechanism for sampling and revisiting service recipients (sample size ≥ 10%)

2. Information construction path

It is recommended to build the evaluation management system in stages:

Basic data collection platform (connected to Tianyancha and other enterprise databases)
Dynamic scoring engine (built-in standard calculation formula)
Result disclosure and appeal channel

Standard evolution analysis

Compared with basic standards such as GB/T 34803, the innovation of this document is:

The first composite service evaluation framework for agricultural materials + agricultural technology
Introduction of a veto mechanism (blacklist directly classified as D level)
Clearly define the scoring criteria for innovative indicators such as industry-university-research cooperation

Future revisions may include: digital service capability indicators (such as IoT device coverage), carbon footprint evaluation and other sustainable development dimensions.

More samples: DL/T 368-2010 NB/T 47013.2-2015 QC/T 942-2021

Sample only — not a preview of GH/T 1350-2021