Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
liquid hydrogen liquid rocket engine military liquid hydrogen standard liquid rocket engine introduction standard revision background 71-1985 gjb 71a-2019 technology improvement hydrogen purity product information conventional rice fields recommendations ipv6 site multi-homing
GJB 71A-2019 in English

GJB 71A-2019 in English

VALID

Specification for liquid hydrogen of liquid rocket engine

  • Issued on:2019-12-08
  • Implemented on:2020-01-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $120.00
$117.00


Introduction

Standard Revision Background and Technology Evolution

GJB 71A-2019, as the third-generation version of the military liquid hydrogen standard, reflects the 34-year development of my country's aerospace propellant technology. Compared with the 1985 version, the standard name clearly defines the special scene of liquid rocket engine, the technical indicators have added helium content control (≤30×10-6), and the detection methods have added three modern analysis technologies such as electrochemical oxygen measurement.


Comparative analysis of core indicators

Key parameters GJB 71-1985 GJB 71A-2019 Technology improvement
Hydrogen purity ≥99.999% Helium-containing type≥99.996% Differentiate helium content scenarios
Parahydrogen content Standard curve method Thermal conductivity chromatography (arbitration) Accuracy improved by 10 times
Total amount of impurities ≤10ppm Helium-containing type≤40ppm Relaxed helium-related impurity limits

Innovation in detection methods

Helium content determination technology

Using a palladium stationary phase chromatographic column (2m×2mm), the detection limit is 10ppm. Typical case: During the test run of a certain model of engine, this technology was used to find that the helium content exceeded the standard (42ppm), avoiding an unstable combustion accident.

Water content dual method verification

The dew point method (GB/T 5832.2) was retained as the arbitration method, and the metal oxide capacitance analysis method was added, which increased the detection efficiency by 60%.


Implementation suggestions

  1. Sampling specifications: Sampling should be done at the filling and venting ports after the liquid hydrogen has stabilized for 24 hours, in compliance with the safety requirements of GB/T 3723
  2. Instrument configuration: The chromatograph should be equipped with a 13X/5A molecular sieve column, and the thermal conductivity detector sensitivity should be ≤30×10-5
  3. Data rounding: According to GB/T 8170, the deviation of parallel determination should be ≤10%

Standard application scenarios

This specification is applicable to the production of hydrogen-oxygen engine fuel for new generation launch vehicles such as the Long March 5, and special provisions are made that storage and transportation must comply with the safety standards of GJB 2645 and GJB 5405.

Sample only — not a preview of GJB 71A-2019
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend