DL/T 2822-2024 in English
VALIDEvaluation and improvement of on-site management benchmarking work in power enterprises
- Issued on:2024-09-24
- Implemented on:2025-03-24
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 2~4 business days
$485.00
| Standard No: | DL/T 2822-2024 |
| Document status: | VALID |
| Title in English: | Evaluation and improvement of on-site management benchmarking work in power enterprises |
| Title in Chinese: | 电力企业现场管理对标工作 评价与改进 |
| Language: | English |
| File Format: | Electronic (PDF) |
| Delivery: | Via email within 2~4 business days |
| Issued on: | 2024-09-24 |
| Implemented on: | 2025-03-24 |
| ICS Classification: | 03.120.10-Quality management and quality assurance |
| Chinese Classification: | F00-Standardization and quality management |
| Professional Classification: | DL-Electricity |
| Related Keywords: | evaluation specialized improvement
management methods result evaluation process evaluation evaluation results maintenance site evaluation |
Introduction
Analysis of the core framework of the standard
| Evaluation dimensions | Weight ratio | Key elements |
|---|---|---|
| Promoting factors | 15% | Leadership, strategic adherence, organizational guarantee, employee quality |
| Process management | 60% | Process planning, process control (implementation/monitoring/improvement) |
| Result output | 25% | 7 major performance indicators such as quality, efficiency, and fulfillment |
Technical points of the evaluation model
The standard innovatively adopts the two-dimensional evaluation models of ADLI (Approach-Deployment-Learning-Integration) and LeTCI (Level-Trend-Comparison-Integration):
- Promotion factor and Process evaluation: Inspect the systematicness and continuous improvement capabilities of management methods
- Result evaluation: Verify management effectiveness through historical comparison and industry benchmarking
Typical application case: During the maintenance site evaluation, a provincial power grid company found that the resource scheduling link was insufficiently deployed (the D factor score was only 35%) through the ADLI score of process control. After targeted improvements, the efficiency index increased by 27% in the following year.
Key links of implementation
1. Evaluation preparation stage
Applicants must have at least 12 months of on-site management practice and their performance must be higher than the regional average. Application materials include:
- Self-declaration (including a commitment of no major accidents for three years)
- On-site self-assessment report
- Confirmatory materials
2. On-site evaluation process
| Phase | Core tasks | Participants |
|---|---|---|
| First meeting | Confirm the evaluation plan/safety matters | All evaluation team + corporate senior management |
| On-site inspection | Random sampling observation/document review | Evaluation team + on-site person in charge |
| Employee discussion | Understand grassroots cognition and suggestions | More than 20% grassroots employees |
Star rating standard
Based on the total score of 1000 points, it is divided into five levels:
- One star (100-199 points): Basic management framework is formed
- Three stars (400-599 points): System approach is fully implemented
- Five stars (800-1000 points): Industry benchmark level
Note: Enterprises that have major accidents will be disqualified from the announcement, and the evaluation results will be valid for 3 years
Continuous improvement mechanism
The standard requires the establishment of a dynamic improvement library, which will be promoted from four dimensions:
| Improvement trigger points | Typical measures |
|---|---|
| Strategic adjustment | Re-evaluate on-site positioning |
| Identify problems during evaluation | Specialized improvement of ADLI elements |
| Technological innovation | Introduce intelligent monitoring methods |
Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
