Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
enterprises emergency logistics capability introductionthis standard emergency logistics capabilities emergency logistics emergency management enterprises cotton ring spinning machines scopethis standard image rotation scopethis part water-soluble pigment
GB/T 30674-2014 in English

GB/T 30674-2014 in English

VALID

Criteria for evaluating enterprises emergency logistics capability

  • Issued on:2014-12-31
  • Implemented on:2015-07-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:RFQ
Price(USD): RFQ
Standard No: GB/T 30674-2014
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Criteria for evaluating enterprises emergency logistics capability
Title in Chinese: 企业应急物流能力评估规范
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: RFQ
Issued on: 2014-12-31
Implemented on: 2015-07-01
ICS Classification: 03.080.01-Services in general
Chinese Classification: A20-Comprehensive Technology
Professional Classification: GB-National Standard
Related Keywords: enterprises emergency logistics capability introductionthis standard
emergency logistics capabilities
emergency logistics
emergency management
enterprises
Related Topics: Evaluation Standards for Emergency Response Capabilities
Emergency + Thirteenth Five-Year + Assessment
Emergency 13th Five-Year Assessment
13th Five-Year Emergency Assessment
Emergency System Assessment
first-class enterprise
First-class enterprise evaluation
Evaluation on emergency capacity building of power grid enterprises
How to evaluate pharmaceutical companies’ commercialization capabilities
Assessment of emergency capabilities of power generation enterprises
Thermal Stress Specifications
Assessment of emergency capacity building of power generation enterprises
emergency capability rating
Enterprise emergency logistics service capability evaluation indicators
Methods for evaluating plant stress resistance
Enterprise AC power consumption
Emergency capability evaluation
Emergency department standardized process industry
Emergency supplies for industrial and trade enterprises
thrust rod company

《GB/T 30674-2014企业应急物流能力评估规范》由TC269(全国物流标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。


Introduction

This standard provides guidelines for evaluating the emergency logistics capabilities of enterprises. It outlines the key elements and indicators that should be considered during the assessment process. The content covers various aspects including resource management, response mechanisms, communication systems, and coordination with external entities. It also defines the procedures for conducting assessments and the criteria for classifying the levels of emergency logistics capabilities. The standard aims to help organizations identify their strengths and weaknesses in emergency logistics, thereby enabling them to improve their preparedness and response effectiveness. It serves as a reference for enterprises, relevant departments, and professionals involved in logistics and emergency management.

*** Please note: This description may not be accurate, please refer to the official documentation.

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 30674-2014
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend