GB/T 34357-2017 in English
VALIDNon-destructive testing--Terminology--Terms used in magnetic flux leakage testing
- Issued on:2017-09-29
- Implemented on:2018-04-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
$194.00
《GB/T 34357-2017无损检测 术语 漏磁检测》由TC56(全国无损检测标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。
Introduction
Interpretation of GB/T 34357—2017 "Non-destructive Testing Terminology - Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing"
1. Background and significance of standard formulation
GB/T 34357—2017 is an important specification in the field of non-destructive testing, which mainly systematically defines magnetic flux leakage testing methods and related terms. The standard was proposed and coordinated by the National Technical Committee for Standardization of Non-destructive Testing, and the drafting units include many industry-leading testing equipment companies and universities.
As an important non-destructive testing technology, magnetic flux leakage testing has a wide range of applications in metal material defect detection. However, with the advancement of technology and the introduction of new methods (such as DC, AC, pulse magnetic flux leakage testing, etc.), the standardization of terms and definitions is particularly important to ensure uniformity and standardization within the industry.
2. Comparative analysis of standard frameworks
| Standard dimensions | Magnetic flux leakage detection methods | Magnetization technology | Magnetic field measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detection types | DC magnetic flux leakage detection (DC MFL), AC magnetic flux leakage detection (AC MFL), pulsed magnetic flux leakage detection (Pulsed MFL), etc. | Technical magnetization, local magnetization, overall magnetization, magnetic flux magnetization, induction magnetization, etc. | Leakage magnetic field measurement, magnetic field component analysis, probe sensitive direction, etc. |
| Core Terms | Residual MFL, Main Magnetic Flux Testing. | Saturation magnetization, unsaturated magnetization, combined magnetization. | Point magnetic probe, straight (arc) line magnetic probe, zero lift-off probe. |
| Technical Features | Applicable to different materials and defect types, with high sensitivity and high detection efficiency. | Combined use of multiple magnetization methods improves detection accuracy. | The angle between the probe sensitive direction and the crack direction directly affects the leakage magnetic induction intensity. |
3. Implementation Suggestions
Technical Application Suggestions:
- In actual testing, the appropriate magnetic flux leakage detection method (such as DC, AC or pulse) should be selected according to the characteristics of the material being tested and the type of defects.
- For scenarios with high sensitivity requirements, it is recommended to use combined magnetization technology to improve detection efficiency and accuracy.
- In terms of probe selection, the detection scheme should be optimized in combination with the angle between the crack direction and the scanning direction to ensure the maximum capture of the magnetic flux leakage signal.
System Optimization Suggestions:
- Regularly calibrate the detection system to ensure the consistency of probe sensitivity and reduce errors caused by equipment aging or environmental factors.
- Optimize the scanning overlap rate and spatial filtering technology to reduce the impact of blind spots on the detection results.
- The Equi-spaced Interval Sampling (EIS) method is used to improve the uniformity and reliability of signal acquisition.

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

GB/T 20737-2006 in English
Non-destructive testing - General terms and definitions
2006-12-25 -

GB/T 18851.4-2005 in English
Non-destructive testing - Penetrant testing - Part4: Equipment
2005-06-08