Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
transaction dispute resolution transaction dispute sound transaction dispute handling rule dispute resolution channels third-party online retail platforms fiber optic signs heating stoves scopethis standard breast cancer screening
GB/T 34827-2017 in English

GB/T 34827-2017 in English

VALID

E-commerce credit-General principles of transaction dispute resolution in online retailing

  • Issued on:2017-11-01
  • Implemented on:2018-02-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $160.00
$156.00
Standard No: GB/T 34827-2017
Document status: VALID
Title in English: E-commerce credit-General principles of transaction dispute resolution in online retailing
Title in Chinese: 电子商务信用 第三方网络零售平台交易纠纷处理通则
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2017-11-01
Implemented on: 2018-02-01
ICS Classification: 03.080.01-Services in general
Chinese Classification: A10-Commerce, Trade and Contract
Professional Classification: GB-National Standard
Related Keywords: transaction dispute resolution
transaction dispute
sound transaction dispute handling rule
dispute resolution channels
third-party online retail platforms
Related Topics: and instrument processing platform
need a third party
online retail
online retail
third party English
GBT34827
GB/T 34827-2017
Third-party testing network platform
Three weighing methods of electronic balance

《GB/T 34827-2017电子商务信用 第三方网络零售平台交易纠纷处理通则》由TC470(全国社会信用标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。


Introduction

GB/T 34827—2017 Standard Overview

National Standard of the People's Republic of China GB/T 34827—2017 specifies the principles, procedures and requirements for handling transaction disputes within third-party online retail platforms, aiming to provide guidance for platforms to establish and improve transaction dispute handling systems. This standard applies to all disputes between buyers and sellers arising from the transaction process, including returns and exchanges, after-sales services, etc.

Background and Significance of Standard Formulation

With the rapid development of e-commerce, online retail sales have increased year by year, and the role of third-party online retail platforms in handling transaction disputes has become increasingly important. The purpose of this standard is to:

  • Protect the legitimate rights and interests of both buyers and sellers
  • Maintain a fair and just trading environment
  • Promote the healthy development of the e-commerce industry

Interpretation of core principles

1. Fairness, justice, objectivity and openness

The platform should publicize the rules for handling transaction disputes and make liability determinations based on objective evidence during the handling process. For example, when dealing with product quality issues, the buyer needs to provide evidence such as photos, and the seller needs to provide supporting materials such as purchase documents.

2. Consumer protection

The platform should establish a consumer rights protection fund and, in certain circumstances, adopt the advance payment measure, that is, use its own funds to refund the buyer in advance during the dispute handling period.

3. Focus on efficiency

The platform needs to simplify the transaction dispute handling process, especially for small transactions, the handling result may only involve the disposal of goods and funds. For example, when the buyer does not receive the goods, the platform can directly execute refund processing.

Principle dimension Specific content Implementation suggestions
Fairness and justice Determine liability based on objective evidence Establish a transparent evidence-giving mechanism and evidence display platform
Consumer protection Establish a consumer rights protection fund and adopt advance payment measures Simplify the complaint process and improve consumer trust
Focus on efficiency Simplify the processing process and reduce processing costs Develop a rapid response mechanism to reduce dispute resolution time

Detailed explanation of transaction dispute handling process

1. Dispute handling application

Both the buyer and the seller can apply for transaction dispute handling through the channels provided by the platform when they cannot resolve the dispute through negotiation. For example, if the buyer finds quality problems after receiving the goods, the buyer should submit a post-sale application within 15 days.

2. Burden of proof

According to the principle of allocation of burden of proof, the buyer needs to provide evidence to support his claim, such as taking photos to prove the surface problems of the goods. The seller needs to provide materials such as purchase documents to prove the quality of the goods.

3. Liability determination and handling measures

The platform determines liability based on the evidence provided by both parties and the data held by the platform. For example, if the buyer purchases counterfeit goods, the transaction will be refunded.

Practical Application Case Analysis

Case 1:The buyer purchased counterfeit goods. After verifying the evidence, the platform executed a refund.

Case 2:The seller refused to sign for the return without reason. The platform executed a refund.

Implementation Suggestions

1. Platform Level

  • Establish a sound transaction dispute handling rule and publicity mechanism
  • Optimize the evidence-gathering process and provide a convenient channel for evidence submission
  • Strengthen technical support to ensure the integrity and security of platform data

2. Consumer Level

  • Improve consumers’ legal awareness and ability to provide evidence
  • Preserve transaction records and related evidence in a timely manner
  • Reasonably use the dispute resolution channels provided by the platform

3. Seller Level

  • Improve the after-sales service system and reduce the occurrence of disputes
  • Establish a product quality monitoring mechanism
  • Actively cooperate with the platform to resolve disputes and provide sufficient evidence

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 34827-2017
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend