Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
ecosystem quality assessment ecosystem assessment methods ecosystem pattern ecosystem quality ecosystem quality evaluation service contents indoor curtain control effective greenhouse gas management practices
GB/T 42340-2023 in English

GB/T 42340-2023 in English

VALID

Ecosystem assessment―Methods for ecosystem pattern and quality assessment

  • Issued on:2023-03-17
  • Implemented on:2023-07-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
Price(USD): $310.00
$301.00
Standard No: GB/T 42340-2023
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Ecosystem assessment―Methods for ecosystem pattern and quality assessment
Title in Chinese: 生态系统评估 生态系统格局与质量评价方法
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 5 business days
Issued on: 2023-03-17
Implemented on: 2023-07-01
ICS Classification: 13.020.10-Environmental management
Chinese Classification: Z00-Standardization and quality management
Professional Classification: GB-National Standard
Related Keywords: ecosystem quality assessment
ecosystem assessment methods
ecosystem pattern
ecosystem quality
ecosystem quality evaluation
Related Topics: ecosystem
Quality Evaluation
Rationale for Systematic Reviews
Texture Rating System
Cobalt valence
13th five-year evaluation price
Series pattern
miniature man-made ecosystem
Conformity Assessment and Assessment
ecosystem development
drive ecosystem
Quality Evaluation
Systematic Review Principles
ecosystem
Dynamic and static methods
systems biology and
Water ecological quality assessment
Water ecological quality assessment
Valence state of cobalt
artificial ecosystem
Niche analysis method
Valence state of palladium
Cobalt valence
double evaluation one evaluation
Alpine Ecosystem
system evaluation
double evaluation double evaluation
Dual Evaluation System
Ecosystem Classification
double evaluation double evaluation
ecological environment ecosystem
micro ecosystem
evaluation system, technology, system
"ecosystem
organic ecosystem
System Experiment Evaluation
Second child evaluation system
Classification of Chinese Ecosystems
self-organizing ecosystem
Forest ecosystem biodiversity monitoring and evaluation
Ecosystem Resilience Assessment
Net assessment thinking and methods
Urban ecological assessment and ecological restoration
Operating system quality evaluation
Systematic Precision Evaluation of Mass Spectrometry Methods
How to generate singlet oxygen
Steady-state drug concentration evaluation methods
Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration
Ecological Corridor Evaluation
gbt42340

《GB/T 42340-2023生态系统评估 生态系统格局与质量评价方法》由TC207(全国环境管理标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为国家标准委。


Introduction

1. Standard Overview

GB/T 42340—2023Ecosystem Assessment - Methods for Ecosystem Pattern and Quality Evaluation is the latest national standard issued by the People's Republic of China. It aims to guide the evaluation of regional ecosystem pattern and quality based on ecosystem spatial distribution data. The standard was proposed by the Ministry of Natural Resources and approved by the State Administration for Market Regulation and the National Standardization Administration.


2. Background of Standard Formulation

With the deepening of ecological civilization construction, ecosystem protection and restoration have become an important part of the national sustainable development strategy. The formulation of this standard is based on the following background:

  • To address the global challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss.
  • To achieve the coordination and unity of ecological protection and economic and social development.
  • To standardize ecosystem assessment methods and provide a scientific basis for policy formulation.

3. Comparison of standard frameworks

Dimensions GB/T 42340—2023 Comparison of international standards
Scope Applicable to the evaluation of terrestrial ecosystem pattern and quality. Covering marine, wetland and urban ecosystems.
Indicator system Includes 12 core indicators such as ecosystem composition and its changes, landscape pattern characteristics, etc. Using common ecological assessment indicators (such as UNEP's AET framework).
Calculation method Combines remote sensing technology and ground survey data. Remote sensing technology is the main method, supplemented by field sampling.

4. Detailed explanation of the standard content

4.1 Ecosystem pattern evaluation

The evaluation of ecosystem pattern is mainly carried out from the following aspects:

  • Ecosystem composition and its changes: Through remote sensing interpretation and historical data analysis, the area proportion and change rate of various ecosystems are evaluated.
  • Landscape pattern characteristics: Including indicators such as the number of patches, average patch area, and boundary density, reflecting the degree of fragmentation of the ecosystem.

4.2 Ecosystem quality evaluation

The evaluation of ecosystem quality focuses on:

  • Biomass density: Calculated using the vegetation index-biomass regression method and the NPP accumulation method.
  • Coverage: Obtain coverage of ecosystems such as grasslands and forests through satellite remote sensing data.

5. Implementation Recommendations

Case Study: Taking a wetland ecosystem in a certain region as an example, its water quality and animal diversity were assessed through a combination of remote sensing technology and ground surveys. The results show that the use of this standard method can significantly improve the accuracy of ecosystem quality assessment.

  • Strengthen multi-source data fusion to improve evaluation efficiency.
  • Promote standardization technology training to ensure implementation consistency.
  • Establish a long-term monitoring network to dynamically track ecosystem changes.

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 42340-2023
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend

  • GB/T 46879-2025 in English

    GB/T 46879-2025 in English

    Technical specifications at the project level for assessment of greenhouse gas emission reductions—Carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage project

    2025-12-31
  • GB/T 24067-2024 in English

    GB/T 24067-2024 in English

    Greenhouse gases—Carbon footprint of products—Requirements and guidelines for quantification

    2024-08-23
  • GB/T 43677-2024 in English

    GB/T 43677-2024 in English

    Ecosystem assessment—Technical guideline for terrestrial ecosystem asset accounting

    2024-03-15
  • GB/T 33859-2017 in English

    GB/T 33859-2017 in English

    Environmental management-Water footprint-Principles,requirements and guidelines

    2017-05-31
  • GB/T 29156-2012 in English

    GB/T 29156-2012 in English

    Production life cycle assessment specification for metal-plastic decorative panel(Product category rules)

    2012-12-31
  • GB/Z 40824-2021 in English

    GB/Z 40824-2021 in English

    Environmental management—Guide on life cycle assessment for electrical and electronic equipment

    2021-10-11