Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
judgment standard ground system fault data interruption judgment standard catastrophic failure permanent failure 1-2 orbital circles data interruption ground system stationary fuel cell power systems part pulp characteristics small mine
QX/T 345-2016 in English

QX/T 345-2016 in English

VALID

Operational failure levels of polar-orbiting meteorological satellites and their ground application systems

  • Issued on:2016-09-29
  • Implemented on:2017-03-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $139.00
$135.00
Standard No: QX/T 345-2016
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Operational failure levels of polar-orbiting meteorological satellites and their ground application systems
Title in Chinese: 极轨气象卫星及其地面应用系统运行故障等级
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2016-09-29
Implemented on: 2017-03-01
ICS Classification: 07.060-Geology. Meteorology. Hydrology
Chinese Classification: A47-Meteorology
Professional Classification: QX-Meteorology
Related Keywords: judgment standard ground system
fault data interruption
judgment standard catastrophic failure permanent failure
1-2 orbital circles data interruption
ground system


Introduction

Analysis of the core content of the standard

This standard establishes a four-level fault classification system for the space segment and ground segment of the polar-orbiting meteorological satellite FY series:

Fault level Satellite system judgment standard Ground system judgment standard
Catastrophic failure Permanent failure of platform/all payloads Not applicable
Level 1 fault Data interruption for ≥2 orbital circles or data availability <85% for 3 orbits Data abnormality for ≥3 receiving circles or data processing interruption for ≥6 hours
Level 2 fault 1-2 orbital circles data interruption or data availability <85% for 1-3 circles 2 receiving circle abnormalities or 4-6 hours processing interruption
Level 3 fault ≤1 orbital circle abnormality or single-circle data availability <85% 1 receiving circle abnormality or 2-4 hours processing interruption

Key technical indicators

Data availability 85% as the core threshold:

  • Based on the observation continuity requirements of payloads such as microwave hygrometer
  • Refer to QJ3050A-2011 FMECA standard for aerospace products
  • Orbital complementarity with QX/T 196-2013 geostationary satellite standard

Implementation suggestions

A case study of a visible light infrared scanning radiometer fault handling:

  1. Data missing for two consecutive orbital circles → triggering the first-level fault response plan
  2. Starting the backup data processing channel
  3. Completing the fault zeroing report within 72 hours

Standard evolution analysis

Main improvements compared to the 2007 trial version:

  • Added fault judgment for the linkage between the ground system and the space segment
  • Refine the calculation method for data availability
  • Clear the orbital circle time benchmark (about 100 minutes/circle)

Sample only — not a preview of QX/T 345-2016
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend