QX/T 413-2018 in English
VALIDGrades of air pollution diffusion meteorological conditions
- Issued on:2018-04-28
- Implemented on:2018-08-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
$194.00
Introduction
Interpretation of the core content of the standard
This standard innovatively establishes a six-level evaluation system based on the Air Pollution Meteorological Index. Through the dynamic coupling calculation of the Calm Weather Index (S) and Pollutant Concentration (O), it achieves a quantitative assessment of the impact of meteorological conditions on pollution diffusion.
Technical specifications for grade classification
| Grade | Index range | Diffusion capacity | Typical meteorological characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 0-100 | Very favorable | Strong wind+low humidity+high mixing layer |
| Grade 3 | 150-185 | Relatively unfavorable | Wind speed ≤2m/s+inversion layer |
| Grade 6 | ≥250 | Extremely unfavorable | Continuous Calm + High Humidity |
Analysis of Key Technical Elements
Mixing Layer Height Calculation
The boundary layer thickness is determined using the potential temperature gradient method. The top of the mixing layer is determined when the vertical rate of change of potential temperature is ≤0.005K/m. This parameter directly affects the vertical diffusion space of pollutants.
Calm Weather Index Algorithm
This algorithm is a weighted summation of the sub-indices of 10 key meteorological factors, with the 10-meter wind speed and vertical velocity having the highest weight coefficients (accounting for approximately 35% of the total impact).
Recommendations for the implementation of the standard
- Data quality control: The spatiotemporal consistency of ground observation station and sounding data must be ensured
- Local calibration: The a₁ and a₂ coefficients should be refitted with the latest data annually
- Warning linkage: The pollution emergency response mechanism should be activated when the index reaches Level 4
Application case in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
During the severe pollution in the winter of 2019, the index remained at Level 5-6, and the correlation coefficient between the measured PM2.5 concentration and the index reached 0.82, which accurately warned of the pollution process that lasted for 12 days.
Technology Evolution Analysis
Compared to GB/T34299-2017, the innovations of this standard are:
1. Introducing the dynamic weight coefficient mechanism (a₂)
2. Adding high-altitude elements (700hPa divergence) as a calculation factor
3. Using the percentile interval method to eliminate the influence of extreme values

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

QX/T 195-2013 in English
Specifications for ionospheric vertical sounding
2013-07-11 -

QX/T 30-2021 in English
Technical specifications for lightning protection of automatic weather stations
2021-07-16 -

QX/T 439-2018 in English
Meteorological services guideline for events一Assessment on the capability of risk resistence and risk control of meteorological disaster
2018-09-20 -

QX/T 549-2022 in English
Meteorological impact index of ecosystem water conservation function
2022-12-06 -

QX/T 563-2020 in English
Packet format of real-time data transmission for meteorological satelliteground segment
2020-07-31 -

QX/T 145-2021 in English
Meteorological requirements for weather anchorperson
2021-07-16 -

QX/T 223-2013 in English
Meteorological archives classifying and coding
2013-12-22 -

QX/T 248-2014 in English
Technical requirements of monitoring systems for stationary hydrogen production plant with water electrolysis
2014-10-24 -

QXKL 0001 S-2015 in English
Q/ Q/XKL 0001 S-2011
2015-01-18 -

QX/T 606-2021 in English
The automatic road weather station
2021-05-10