SF/T 0074-2020 in English
VALIDTechnical specification for forensic identification of cultivated land and forestland destruction
- Issued on:2020-05-29
- Implemented on:2020-05-29
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
$146.00
| Standard No: | SF/T 0074-2020 |
| Document status: | VALID |
| Title in English: | Technical specification for forensic identification of cultivated land and forestland destruction |
| Title in Chinese: | 耕地和林地破坏司法鉴定技术规范 |
| Language: | English |
| File Format: | Electronic (PDF) |
| Delivery: | Via email within 1~3 business days |
| Issued on: | 2020-05-29 |
| Implemented on: | 2020-05-29 |
| ICS Classification: | 03.160-Law. Administration |
| Chinese Classification: | A92-Crime judging technology |
| Professional Classification: | SF- |
| Related Keywords: | cultivated land
forest land technical specification important technical specification forensic identification |
| Related Topics: | arable land
judicial law of destruction destroy law of destruction woodland organic destruction forensics Dryland cultivated land preparation technical regulations disruptive technology PSA forensic identification Forensic identification of xylazine sf/t 0030 |
本标准规定了耕地和林地破坏司法鉴定的委托与受理、鉴定程序和方法及鉴定意见的要求。
本标准适用于环境损害司法鉴定领域中土地性质为耕地和林地的土地破坏鉴定。
Introduction
Interpretation of the core content of the standard
As an important technical specification in the field of judicial identification of environmental damage, this standard mainly solves professional and technical problems in cases of destruction of cultivated land and forest land. Its technical framework includes three core modules:
| Module | Technical requirements | Legal basis |
|---|---|---|
| Entrustment acceptance | 7 types of basic materials + qualification review are required | Ministry of Justice Order No. 107 |
| Identification procedure | 4-stage working method + 5 sampling schemes | HJ/T 166+NY/T 395 |
| Opinion formation | 5 types of severe damage judgment standards | GB 15618+GB 36600 |
Analysis of key technical points
1. Special requirements for on-site investigation
The standard requires that more than two judicial appraisers jointly conduct the investigation, and three parties must witness it (the client + the party concerned). The investigation must cover 7 types of key information sources, including historical archives verification of the land administration department and on-site interviews with local people.
2. Innovative sampling point distribution method
Differentiated schemes are adopted for different types of damage:
- Physical damage:Zigzag/plum blossom-shaped distribution, ≥3 sampling points in a unit
- Pollution damage:Establish a three-dimensional pollution plume model according to HJ 25.1
- Biological damage:A customized ecosystem damage assessment scheme is required
Suggestions for the implementation of the standard
1. Capacity building of appraisal institutions
It is recommended to establish a four-dimensional capability matrix:
- Surveying and mapping qualification (at least Class C)
- CMA certification and testing items cover all indicators of GB 15618
- GIS spatial analysis system
- Professional team for ecological risk assessment
2. : Key points for building a chain of evidence
A three-in-one evidence package should be formed:
- Spatial evidence: remote sensing images + on-site mapping data
- Material evidence: soil profile specimens + laboratory test reports
- Related evidence: land use historical archives + witness testimony
Typical case analysis
Case: Identification of forest damage caused by illegal mining
A mining area violated the Forest Law and mined, resulting in the complete stripping of the topsoil of 12 acres of ecological public welfare forest. Identification agency:
- Using UAV oblique photography to build a three-dimensional model
- Six profile samples were collected using the plum blossom pattern method
- Soil organic matter content was tested to be less than 0.5% (control point 3.2%)
- The destruction was determined by citing the judicial interpretation of forest land by the Supreme People's Court
Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
