TB/T 2349-2016 in English
VALIDFatigue test method for connection of railway steel bridge
- Issued on:2016-08-16
- Implemented on:2017-02-16
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
$204.00
Introduction
Core changes in the standard revision
| Technical elements | 1993 edition | 2016 edition | Upgrade points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of specimens | Grading requirements are not specified | Grading regulations according to test type (curve test ≥8, inspection test ≥3) | Strengthen data reliability |
| Loading control | Only basic requirements are specified | Add frequency limit (≤60Hz) and load correction requirements | Improve test accuracy |
| Data Analysis | Simple Linear Regression | Add Correlation Coefficient Test Table (Confidence Level 95%) | More rigorous statistics |
Detailed explanation of key technical requirements
1. Specimen preparation specifications
The standard requires that the specimens must maintain the three same principles: same material (chemical composition, mechanical properties), same process (welding/connection process), same stress field (local stress state). Special specimens such as cylindrical head weld nails must meet the requirement of height-to-diameter ratio ≥4.
2. Key parameters of testing machine
- Dynamic force calibration: must comply with GB/T 25917 repeatability error ≤±1%
- Coaxiality deviation: JJG 556-2011 stipulates ≤5%
- Safety monitoring: cycle counter error <0.1%
3. Fatigue curve establishment method
Linear regression under double logarithmic coordinates:
lgN = A - mlgΔσ
The correlation coefficient |γ| must be greater than the value specified in Table 1 (such as γmin=0.707 when n=8), otherwise additional test data is required.
Implementation suggestions
Typical case: Node test of a Yangtze River highway-railway bridge
Adopt step loading method for node plate specimens:
1. Firstly, 2 million times of 2×106 times @120MPa stress amplitude
2. Stepwise reduction to 80MPa and continuous loading until failure
Finally, the SN curve slope of m=3.2 is obtained, and the correlation coefficient reaches 0.91.
Background of standard evolution
With the complexity of the load spectrum of high-speed railway bridges, the 2016 version adds variable amplitude loading and special environment simulation requirements. Compared with international standards (such as EN 1993-1-9), my country's standards are more detailed in the classification of welded joints, but lack multi-axial fatigue test clauses.

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

TB/T 2872-1998 in English
Test method for compatibility of filter element materials and fluids for diesel locomotives
1998-02-24 -

TB/T 2857-1997 in English
Safety and Hygiene Requirements for Special Railway Stations for Dangerous Goods
1997-04-10 -

TB/T 2895-1997 in English
Turnout conversion resistance adhesion force
1997-04-10 -

TB/T 2873-1998 in English
Test method for anti-collapse and anti-crack performance of diesel locomotive filter elements
1998-02-24