Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
performance evaluation medical background evaluation evaluation plan diagnostic medical devices key terms terms definition application scenarios performance evaluation study systematic study transfer impedance scopethis document horizontal pressure steam sterilizer medical ultrasonic doppler
YY/T 1441-2016 in English

YY/T 1441-2016 in English

VALID

General requirements of performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices

  • Issued on:2016-01-26
  • Implemented on:2017-01-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $130.00
$127.00
Standard No: YY/T 1441-2016
Document status: VALID
Title in English: General requirements of performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices
Title in Chinese: 体外诊断医疗器械性能评估通用要求
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2016-01-26
Implemented on: 2017-01-01
ICS Classification: 11.100-Laboratory medicine
Chinese Classification: C30-Medical apparatus and devices in general
Professional Classification: YY-Pharmaceutics
Related Keywords: performance evaluation
medical background evaluation
evaluation plan
diagnostic medical devices
key terms terms definition application scenarios performance evaluation study systematic study
Related Topics: Exosome Flow Cytometry Diagnosis
Medical device performance
Medical Device Rhythm Requirements
poc in vitro diagnostics
yy/t 1441-2016
yy/t1441-2016
General requirements for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices
yy/t 1441
yy/t1441
medical consultation box
Diagnostic Reagents Medical Devices
Exosome diagnosis
In Vitro Diagnostic Criteria
IVD Network
In vitro diagnostic performance
Diagnostic reagents for medical devices
Classification of in vitro diagnostics
IVD Network
In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents Medical Devices
Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents
In vitro diagnostic field
Premium Performance Diagnostic System
In vitro diagnostic medical services
In vitro diagnostic consumables
Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents
Medical Devices and In Vitro Reagents
performance evaluation
performance evaluation
Medical diagnostic instrument
Basic requirements for in vitro diagnostic medical devices for self-testing
Medical Diagnostic Instruments
yy t 1441 2016
yy+t+1441+2016
In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices
sex device
Medical Device Diagnosis
Medical Diagnostic Instruments
sex device
In Vitro Medical Testing
medical diagnosis system
Medical Device Testing Requirements
yy/t+1441
In vitro/be
In vitro diagnostics for medical devices
Class III medical device in vitro diagnostic reagents
IVD time
diagnostic medical
Is the outer box required for medical devices?
In Vitro Diagnostic Sensors
Technical Requirements for Class II Medical Devices
Medical Device Evaluation
What are the methods of in vitro diagnosis
Class III in vitro diagnostic reagents for medical devices
Purchasing Requirements for In Vitro Diagnostic Instruments
IVD time
Labeling Requirements for Outer Cartons of Medical Devices
Diagnostic Reagents Medical Devices
Class III medical device in vitro diagnostic reagents
Medical device performance
In vitro diagnostic reagents and medical devices
yy t 1441
technical diagnostic assessment
US IVD
in vitro diagnostic pcr
In vitro in silico evaluation
in vitro diagnostics
Global In Vitro Diagnostics
Advanced Overseas Medical
In Vitro Diagnostic Catalog
In vitro diagnostic exosomes in China
Technical requirements for in vitro diagnostic instruments
Rapid Diagnostic Reagents Medical Devices
abs in vitro diagnostics
In Vitro Diagnostic Recommendations
Recommended in vitro diagnostics in China
In Vitro Diagnostic Recommendations
Labeling Requirements for Outer Cartons of Medical Devices
In vitro testing of medical devices
IVD Repair
Medical Device Evaluation
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Clinical Diagnostic Tests
General Medical Devices
yy1441
YY in vitro diagnostics
in vitro diagnostics
Medical device noise standard requirements
Veterinary diagnostic and treatment equipment
Fluorescent medical diagnostic methods
In vitro diagnostics in Germany
Medical device performance evaluation
Fluorescence standard requirements for medical devices
Medical device standard upgrade evaluation
Medical device infrared spectrum testing
sae j 1441-2016

本标准规定了制造商在体外诊断医疗器械性能评估研究中对研究计划、实施、评估和制定文件的职责和总体要求。
本标准适用于对体外诊断医疗器械的性能评估。本标准不适用于对某一特定体外诊断医疗器械或某一具体用途的评估方案。


Introduction

Analysis of the core content of the standard

As a programmatic document for the performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD MD), this standard establishes the full process specification from research plan formulation to evaluation report generation. Its technical framework is coordinated with the international standard ISO 20916:2019, and at the same time, special requirements for self-test products are added in combination with China's regulatory practices.

Definition of key terms

Terms Definition Application scenarios
Performance Evaluation Study Systematic study to confirm that the IVD MD meets the performance claim under the intended conditions of use Pre-market validation of new products
Evaluation Plan Detailed plan including study objectives, sample size, timeline, etc. Inter-laboratory comparison study
Non-professionals Self-test product users without medical background Evaluation of home testing devices

Detailed explanation of implementation points

4.1 Establishment of responsibility system

Manufacturers need to establish a three-level responsibility system: the research leader coordinates resource allocation, the researcher performs on-site assessment, and the quality management team conducts the final compliance review. A typical case shows that Roche Diagnostics adopted a cross-departmental collaboration model in the evaluation of blood glucose meters, which shortened the evaluation cycle by 30%.

5.2 Evaluation plan design

The plan must include 7 core elements:
1) Proof of researcher qualifications
2) List of participating institutions
3) Phased time nodes
4) Basis for calculating the minimum sample size
5) Description of usage restrictions
6) Matrix of performance indicators to be verified
7) Standardized record template

Special requirements for self-test products

Taking the COVID-19 antigen self-test kit as an example, ≥200 non-professionals need to be recruited to participate in the evaluation. The test environment needs to simulate a home use scenario, and it is prohibited to provide operating instructions outside the instructions.


Technology Evolution Analysis

Compared with the 2003 version of YY/T 0287, the main progress of this standard is reflected in:
• Added Self-test Product Evaluation Specifications
• Clarified Software Confirmation Requirements
• Refined Sample Exclusion Criteria
• Strengthened Ethical Review Clauses

Compliance Implementation Suggestions

  1. Establish a dynamic evaluation mechanism and implement hierarchical management of design changes
  2. Use blockchain technology to ensure that research records cannot be tampered with
  3. Conduct GCP training for researchers regularly
  4. Refer to CLSI EP series standards to improve testing procedures

Sample only — not a preview of YY/T 1441-2016
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend