Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
electric power patent valuation introduction background power patents power industry key elements power companies power generation/transmission/distribution fields disc aerator ditch membrane surface nucleic acids analyzers jjf
DL/T 2138-2020 in English

DL/T 2138-2020 in English

VALID

Specification for electric power patent valuation

  • Issued on:2020-10-23
  • Implemented on:2021-02-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $240.00
$233.00


Introduction

Background of Standard Compilation and Industry Demand

Currently, there are three major pain points in the evaluation of power patents: lack of third-party institutions, inconsistent standards, and insufficient evidence. According to survey data, 78% of power companies still use qualitative descriptions in their patent evaluations, and the application rate of quantitative indicators is less than 35%.


Comparison of core evaluation frameworks

Evaluation dimensions Traditional methods Innovation of this standard
Technical value Expert subjective scoring Quantitative indicators + technology maturity matrix
Legal value Ownership review Claim stability analysis
Economic value Market forecast and estimation Application scenario modeling of the power industry

Key elements of implementation

Qualification requirements for assessment institutions

Must have: electricity professional technical background + intellectual property assessment qualifications + third-party independence certification. For example, a provincial power research institute increased the assessment accuracy by 42% by forming a interdisciplinary assessment team.

Construction of differentiated indicator library

It is recommended that enterprises adjust the evaluation weight coefficient dynamically according to:
1. Differences in power generation/transmission/distribution fields
2. Patent life cycle stage
3. Technology transformation path


Technology evolution trend

With the application of digital twins and blockchain technologies, future evaluation will develop in the following directions:
• Dynamic value tracking
• Automatic evaluation of smart contracts
• Cross-chain data verification
The current standard has reserved the API interface specification chapter for subsequent expansion.

Sample only — not a preview of DL/T 2138-2020
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend

  • DL/T 790.12-2001 in English

    DL/T 790.12-2001 in English

    Distribution Automation Using Distribution Line Carrier Part 1: General Provisions Part 2: Guidelines for Formulation of Specifications

    2001-12-26
  • DL/T 328-2022 in English

    DL/T 328-2022 in English

    Vacuum laser alignment displacement measuring apparatus

    2022-05-13
  • DL/T 646-1998 in English

    DL/T 646-1998 in English

    Technical specification of manufacturing steel transmission pole structures

    1998-03-19