DL/T 2823-2024 in English
VALIDPower Enterprise Exemplary Performance Benchmark Evaluation and Improvement
- Issued on:2024-09-24
- Implemented on:2025-03-24
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$649.00
| Standard No: | DL/T 2823-2024 |
| Document status: | VALID |
| Title in English: | Power Enterprise Exemplary Performance Benchmark Evaluation and Improvement |
| Title in Chinese: | 电力企业卓越绩效标杆 评价与改进 |
| Language: | English |
| File Format: | Electronic (PDF) |
| Delivery: | Via email within 5 business days |
| Issued on: | 2024-09-24 |
| Implemented on: | 2025-03-24 |
| ICS Classification: | 03.120.10-Quality management and quality assurance |
| Chinese Classification: | F00-Standardization and quality management |
| Professional Classification: | DL-Electricity |
| Related Keywords: | power enterprise exemplary performance benchmark evaluation
rate/solar power abandonment rate power supply standard evaluation objectsingle enterprise power industry first special performance excellence evaluation standard |
Introduction
Core framework and innovative highlights of the standard
As the first special performance excellence evaluation standard in the power industry, DL/T 2823-2024 has constructed a 1000-point evaluation system including 7 modules: Leadership (110 points), Strategy (90 points), and Customers and Markets (90 points), highlighting the following innovations:
| Dimension | Traditional evaluation | Innovation of this standard |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation object | Single enterprise entity | Covering organizational units such as branches/departments |
| Technology integration | General management requirements | Emphasis on the integration of technologies such as energy internet and new power systems |
| Risk management | Post-event response | Embedded resilience building requirements |
Analysis of key implementation points
1. Evaluation and grading management mechanism
The standard innovatively establishes a 2A-5A grading promotion mechanism:
- 2A→3A: 1 year or more and ≥400 points
- 3A→4A: 2 years or more and ≥500 points
- 4A→5A: 3 years or more and ≥600 points
2. Evaluation of the four elements of process maturity
Use the ADLI model to evaluate the management process:
Typical case: In the 7.5.2 process implementation clause, a provincial power grid company obtained a high score of 85 points in this clause by establishing a cross-departmental process owner system (method), developing a digital process monitoring platform (deployment), monthly process optimization seminars (learning), and linking assessments with strategic KPIs (integration).
Industry differentiation implementation suggestions
| Enterprise type | Key clauses | Special requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Power generation enterprises | 7.7.2 Product results | Need to disclose new energy indicators such as wind power abandonment rate/solar power abandonment rate |
| Power supply enterprises | 7.3.2 Customer satisfaction | Mandatory access to 95598 complaint data comparison |
| Design institutes | 7.4.4 Technical resources | The number of patents and standard compilations as hard indicators |
Digital transformation connection guidance
The standard places special emphasis on integrating digital capabilities in the following clauses:
- 7.4.3 Information management: requires the establishment of a knowledge management platform to make tacit knowledge explicit
- 7.6.1 Performance measurement: recommends the use of big data analysis technology
- Appendix A.2 Indicators: adds new KPIs such as the customer service digitalization index
Implementation case: A certain group built a excellent performance digital cockpit to achieve real-time data automatic collection and industry benchmarking for 7.7 result-type clauses, shortening the evaluation cycle from 3 months to 2 weeks.
Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-
DL/T 2822-2024 in English
Evaluation and improvement of on-site management benchmarking work in power enterprises
2024-09-24
