GB/T 24031-2021 in English
VALIDThe clothing with safety sign for the working people on roads
- Issued on:2021-03-09
- Implemented on:2021-10-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$534.00
《GB/T 24031-2021环境管理 环境绩效评价 指南》由TC207(全国环境管理标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为国家标准化管理委员会。
Introduction
Analysis of the core content of the standard
GB/T24031-2021, as an equivalent adopted standard of ISO14031:2013, has constructed a complete environmental performance evaluation framework including Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA). The standard highlights three major innovations:
- Added requirements for the association between environmental performance parameters and sustainable development
- Strengthened the application scenarios of environmental condition parameters (ECIs)
- Refined the selection dimensions of operation performance parameters (OPIs)
Environmental Performance Parameter System
| Parameter type | Measurement dimension | Typical application |
|---|---|---|
| Management Performance Parameters (MPIs) | Training investment, compliance cost, resource allocation | Predict performance trends and identify management deficiencies |
| Operational Performance Parameters (OPIs) | Energy consumption intensity, emission concentration, resource circulation rate | Process optimization, technology improvement evaluation |
| Environmental condition parameters (ECIs) | Regional air quality, water pollutant concentration | Environmental impact tracing, community relationship management |
Key steps for implementation
1. Evaluation and planning stage
Key considerations include: life cycle perspective (from raw material acquisition to product disposal), stakeholder demands (collected through questionnaires/hearings) and industry benchmarks (such as CO2 emissions per ton of product in the cement industry).
2. Data collection and analysis
It is recommended to use the mass balance method (see GB/T24040) to ensure data integrity, establish a metering ledger for key flows such as energy and wastewater, and use statistical tools (such as control charts) to identify abnormal values.
3. Performance improvement cycle
Case: A petrochemical company found that seal aging was the main cause of leakage through combined parameters (VOCs emissions per unit of output value + equipment inspection and maintenance frequency), and reduced emissions by 23% annually.
Comparison of Industry Application Differences
| Industry | Key Performance Parameters (KPIs) | Difficulties in Data Collection |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing | Comprehensive Energy Consumption per Unit Product, Compliance Disposal Rate of Hazardous Waste | Normalization of Data from Multiple Production Bases |
| Service Industry | Per Capita Paper Consumption, Proportion of Green Procurement | Quantification of Indirect Environmental Impact |
Analysis of Standard Evolution
Compared with the 2001 version, the new standard:
- Add requirements for environmental cost management (Appendix A.4.2.2.3)
- Refine the evaluation method for supply chain environmental performance (4.2.2.3)
- Introduce the concept of ecosystem service assessment (3.3 Note 2)
Technical trend: parameter settings extend to emerging areas such as carbon footprint and biodiversity.

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

GB/T 24016-2026 in English
Environmental management—Guidelines on the assurance of environmental reports
2026-01-28 -

GB/T 24007-2024 in English
Environmental management—Guidelines for determining environmental costs and benefits
2024-09-29 -

GB/T 32355.2-2015 in English
Assessment values of recyclability rate for electrical and electronic products―Part 2: Washing machines, television sets and computers
2015-12-31 -

GB/T 43385-2023 in English
Environmental management systems—Guidelines for a flexible approach to phased implementation
2023-11-27