GB/T 36953.3-2018 in English
VALIDEvaluation method of urban public transportation passenger satisfaction--Part 3: Urban rail transit
- Issued on:2018-12-28
- Implemented on:2019-07-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$418.00
《GB/T 36953.3-2018城市公共交通乘客满意度评价方法 第3部分:城市轨道交通》由TC529(全国城市客运标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为交通运输部。
Introduction
Analysis of the core framework of the standard
This standard constructs an evaluation system with five major criteria: safety, reliability, convenience, comfort, and economy, with 32 secondary indicators. A dual-track verification mechanism of service performance model (SP) and structural equation model (SEM) is adopted, in which:
| Model type | Calculation method | Weight determination method | Applicable scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service Performance Model | SP=∑(wi×Pi) | Hierarchy Analysis Method/Binomial Coefficient Method | Regular Annual Evaluation |
| Structural Equation Model | Latent Variable Path Analysis | Standardized Parameter Estimation | Deep Attribution Analysis |
Key Technology Implementation Points
1. Data collection specifications
The sampling design must follow the stratified random sampling principle, and the sample size of super-large stations should be ≥102/station (at a confidence level of 95%). Appendix C provides the sample size calculation formula:
n=(μ1-α/2×σ/d)2
Where the allowable deviation d is recommended to be 0.5-1.0, and the population standard deviation σ is usually 6-8.
2. Key points of questionnaire design
Use a 5-level Likert scale (1-5 points correspond to dissatisfied-satisfied), which must pass:
- Reliability test: α coefficient> 0.7 (the total scale must reach 0.891)
- Validity test: KMO> 0.9 and Bartlett test p<0.05
Strategic application suggestions
Application of importance-performance matrix
According to the quadrant analysis method in Appendix F, the typical indicators are distributed as follows:
| Quadrant | Representative indicator | Management strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Priority improvement areas | Station hall order (3.97 points), information update (3.94 points) | Immediately optimize resource allocation |
| Advantage areas | Train safety (4.72 points), emergency response (4.33 points) | Maintain and form standards |
Empirical data show that the total effect of passenger expectations on satisfaction is 0.36 (direct 0.05 + indirect 0.31), indicating that basic service experience is more influential than marketing promises.
Standard evolution background
This standard introduces the structural equation model into the field of rail transit evaluation for the first time, breaking through the linear assumption of traditional satisfaction evaluation. Compared with GB/T 19038-2009, the following are added:
- Dynamic weight adjustment mechanism (Appendix A)
- Multi-level sampling plan (Clause 9.1.4)
- Strategic matrix analysis tool (Appendix F)
The practice of 32 participating units across the country shows that this standard can increase the correlation between satisfaction evaluation results and passenger complaints to 0.82.

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

GB/T 44718-2024 in English
Accessibility service specification for urban rail transit operations
2024-10-26 -

GB/T 41594-2022 in English
Technical requirements for comprehensive emergency command system of urban rail transit network
2022-10-12