Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
national park governance system national park introduction standard framework core indicators evaluation dimensions annual assessment phase evaluation cycle co-management committee typical application cases sanjiangyuan national park evaluation specification creep cavity inspection stainless steel cutlery nitrobenzoic acid
GB/T 39739-2020 in English

GB/T 39739-2020 in English

VALID

Specification for assessment of the national park

  • Issued on:2020-12-22
  • Implemented on:2021-07-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
Price(USD): $370.00
$359.00
Standard No: GB/T 39739-2020
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Specification for assessment of the national park
Title in Chinese: 国家公园考核评价规范
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 5 business days
Issued on: 2020-12-22
Implemented on: 2021-07-01
ICS Classification: 65.020-Farming and forestry
Chinese Classification: B65-Forest conservation
Professional Classification: GB-National Standard
Related Keywords: national park governance system
national park introduction standard framework
core indicators evaluation dimensions annual assessment phase evaluation cycle
co-management committee typical application cases sanjiangyuan national park
evaluation specification
Related Topics: National Park
assessment
public examination
Consistency Evaluation Country
National level a
Yipin Home
National Consistency Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
garden
Evaluation
Acid value national standard
jurassic park
National Specification Conditions
foreign nucleic acid
Assessment criteria
GBT39739
GB/T 39739-2020
National Energy Administration Nuclear Power Planning
Performance testing national evaluation
national acid price
National specifications for security configuration
Full text disclosure system of national regulations and specifications
National Nuclear Power Standards
Disclosure of national regulations and specifications
normative evaluation
Type evaluation and assessment
National Standards Disclosure System
National Standards for Hydrogen Production from Liquid Ammonia
National Park Assessment and Evaluation

《GB/T 39739-2020国家公园考核评价规范》由432(国家林业和草原局)归口,主管部门为国家林业和草原局。


Introduction

Standard Framework and Technological Evolution

As the first special assessment and evaluation specification for national parks in my country, this standard has constructed a complete evaluation system including 4 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators and 58 tertiary indicators, reflecting the paradigm shift from traditional protected area management to national park governance system.


Comparative Analysis of Core Indicators

Evaluation Dimensions Annual Assessment Phase Evaluation
Cycle 1 year 5 years
Core Weight Protection and Management Effectiveness (50%) Management Effectiveness (40%) + Ecological Assets (40%)
Characteristic Indicators Negative List Deduction System Quantitative Assessment of Ecosystem Authenticity

Key term analysis

Ecological assets

Definition: including natural resource assets (stocks such as forests and wetlands) and ecosystem service assets (regulation, cultural and other service flows). The accounting method of Appendix C shall be adopted for assessment, such as carbon storage using the ecosystem productivity model.

Authenticity assessment

Operational standards: The core area's native ecosystem ratio is required to be greater than 95% and the quality rate is greater than 70% (Grade A), and the resident population density is less than 5 people/km². It is necessary to combine remote sensing interpretation with field verification.


Implementation Suggestions

Data Collection Optimization

It is recommended to establish an integrated ground-air monitoring network:

  • Satellite remote sensing for ecosystem fragmentation assessment
  • Internet of Things sensors for real-time monitoring of water quality/air quality
  • Patrol terminal APP to record species observation data

Community participation mechanism

Referring to Article 6.2.3 of the standard, this can be achieved through:

  1. Establishing public welfare patrol posts (accounting for 20% of the score)
  2. Developing ecological agricultural product franchise
  3. Establishing a community co-management committee


Typical application cases

Sanjiangyuan National Park in the 2021 stage evaluation:

  • Soil conservation increased by 12% using the RUSLE model
  • Species conservation score improved through snow leopard infrared camera monitoring
  • Community participation score reached 19 points (out of 20)
It was finally rated "excellent" (92 points).

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 39739-2020
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend