GB/T 39739-2020 in English
VALIDSpecification for assessment of the national park
- Issued on:2020-12-22
- Implemented on:2021-07-01
- File Format:PDF
- Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
$359.00
《GB/T 39739-2020国家公园考核评价规范》由432(国家林业和草原局)归口,主管部门为国家林业和草原局。
Introduction
Standard Framework and Technological Evolution
As the first special assessment and evaluation specification for national parks in my country, this standard has constructed a complete evaluation system including 4 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators and 58 tertiary indicators, reflecting the paradigm shift from traditional protected area management to national park governance system.
Comparative Analysis of Core Indicators
| Evaluation Dimensions | Annual Assessment | Phase Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle | 1 year | 5 years |
| Core Weight | Protection and Management Effectiveness (50%) | Management Effectiveness (40%) + Ecological Assets (40%) |
| Characteristic Indicators | Negative List Deduction System | Quantitative Assessment of Ecosystem Authenticity |
Key term analysis
Ecological assets
Definition: including natural resource assets (stocks such as forests and wetlands) and ecosystem service assets (regulation, cultural and other service flows). The accounting method of Appendix C shall be adopted for assessment, such as carbon storage using the ecosystem productivity model.
Authenticity assessment
Operational standards: The core area's native ecosystem ratio is required to be greater than 95% and the quality rate is greater than 70% (Grade A), and the resident population density is less than 5 people/km². It is necessary to combine remote sensing interpretation with field verification.
Implementation Suggestions
Data Collection Optimization
It is recommended to establish an integrated ground-air monitoring network:
- Satellite remote sensing for ecosystem fragmentation assessment
- Internet of Things sensors for real-time monitoring of water quality/air quality
- Patrol terminal APP to record species observation data
Community participation mechanism
Referring to Article 6.2.3 of the standard, this can be achieved through:
- Establishing public welfare patrol posts (accounting for 20% of the score)
- Developing ecological agricultural product franchise
- Establishing a community co-management committee
Typical application cases
Sanjiangyuan National Park in the 2021 stage evaluation:
- Soil conservation increased by 12% using the RUSLE model
- Species conservation score improved through snow leopard infrared camera monitoring
- Community participation score reached 19 points (out of 20)

Loading PDF document...
Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.
We also recommend
-

GB/T 44590-2024 in English
Guidelines for evaluation of ecological benefits of natural forest conservation and rehabilitation
2024-09-29 -

GB/T 47048-2026 in English
General requirements for signage of protected areas
2026-01-28 -

GB/T 39736-2020 in English
Technical specification for the national park master plan
2020-12-22