Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
putties scopethis standard applies pear pulp broadband universal services
QX/T 373-2017 in English

QX/T 373-2017 in English

VALID

Evaluation method of meterorogical satellite data sharing services

  • Issued on:2017-02-10
  • Implemented on:2017-06-15
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $220.00
$214.00
Standard No: QX/T 373-2017
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Evaluation method of meterorogical satellite data sharing services
Title in Chinese: 气象卫星数据共享服务评估方法
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2017-02-10
Implemented on: 2017-06-15
ICS Classification: 07.060-Geology. Meteorology. Hydrology
Chinese Classification: A47-Meteorology
Professional Classification: QX-Meteorology
Related Topics: shared service
satellite data
hj/t 373
Guardian Thirteenth Five-Year Assessment
Meteorology + Thirteenth Five-Year + Evaluation
co-wall phenomenon
prescription sharing
satellite data
shared service
microsatellite service
share factor
QX
climate satellite
small meteorological data
Evaluate trial data
Satellite Data Parameters
Methods to establish information sharing database
Data Sharing Standard Database
Meteorological satellite calibration
Meteorological service place
Satellite data aggregation

本文件规定了气象卫星数据共享服务评估的指标体系、指标的计算方法和评估流程。 本文件适用于对气象卫星数据共享服务工作的评估。


Introduction

Standard Background and Scope of Application

QX/T 373-2017 was proposed by the National Technical Committee for Satellite Meteorology and Space Weather Standardization and compiled by the National Satellite Meteorological Center. The standard established a quantitative evaluation framework for meteorological satellite data sharing services for the first time, which is applicable to the service quality evaluation of various meteorological data service agencies.


Core evaluation indicator system

Evaluation category First-level indicator Second-level indicator example Weight basis
Energy efficiency evaluation Shared service capability Data storage capability, online processing capability, network security Expert evaluation method (Delphi)
Shared service benefits Number of users, service results, economic benefits Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
Application evaluation Service platform usability Reasonableness of product classification and convenience of query User satisfaction survey
Service process standardization Network/protocol/consulting service process Process audit results

Analysis of key technical methods

4.1 Comprehensive evaluation calculation formula

Total score = energy efficiency evaluation score × 0.4 + application evaluation score × 0.6, reflecting the user-centered evaluation orientation.

4.2 Key points for implementing energy efficiency assessment

Case: When a provincial meteorological data center calculates service capability indicators through formula (3), it needs to focus on monitoring:
1) data storage capacity (storage capacity ≥500TB)
2) online processing response time (<30 seconds)
3) Annual number of safety drills (≥4 times)


Recommendations for standard implementation

  1. Questionnaire design phase: Pre-testing is required to ensure Cronbach's α ≥0.6
  2. Survey sample requirements: ≥5 energy efficiency assessment experts, ≥25 user survey participants
  3. Dynamic weight adjustment: It is recommended to re-verify the indicator weights through SAC/TC347 every 2 years

Technology Evolution Analysis

Compared with QX/T 112-2010, this standard innovatively:
1) Introduces energy efficiency evaluation to quantify service infrastructure capabilities
2) Establishes a 6-dimensional application evaluation model for the entire service process
3) Explicitly adopts a 9-point expert scoring method (see Table A.1)

Sample only — not a preview of QX/T 373-2017
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend