Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
upper limbs steel structure grids flow test evaluation method
RB/T 034-2020 in English

RB/T 034-2020 in English

VALID

Guidance on verification and validation of microbiological testing methods

  • Issued on:2020-08-26
  • Implemented on:2020-12-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $240.00
$233.00
Standard No: RB/T 034-2020
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Guidance on verification and validation of microbiological testing methods
Title in Chinese: 测量设备校准周期的确定和调整方法指南
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2020-08-26
Implemented on: 2020-12-01
Related Topics: Equipment calibration period
cycle
RB∕T
rb/t 197
rb/t 195
rb/t 190
rb/t 115
rb/t 205
rb/t 204
equipment cycle
rb/t
rab rb
Institutional adjustment
rb/t 116
equipment calibration
rb/t+
Measuring equipment in
Institutional adjustment period
rb /t
rb/t 119
rb t
equipment calibration
Measurement preparation
holiday adjustment
Measuring Equipment Calibration
Standard material calibration cycle
Measuring Equipment Calibration
RB T 199
Device Validation Guide
Mid-term adjustment
13th five-year mid-term adjustment
rb t 119
rb /t 120
rb/t 120
holiday adjustment
Equipment Calibration Equipment
Calibration definition
rb/t 199
rb period
rb/t 104
rb t 197
Calibration of measuring equipment
Equipment Calibration and Equipment Verification
rb/t 191
RB RB/T
rb/t 188
Oxygen and explosion detector calibration cycle
Balance self-calibration cycle
measuring equipment
Three methods of cell cycle determination
Viscometer calibration cycle
The latest version of the principles and methods of calibration cycle of measuring instruments
Calibration method for determining the accurate content of a substance
Principles and methods for determining the calibration cycle of measuring instruments
Spectrometer adjustment method
National measurement standard verification and calibration cycle
How to measure the cell cycle
Range/zero adjustment method and wiring method
How to adjust the wire straightener
Instrument calibration cycle
Adjustment methods to prevent calibration failure
Cell cycle determination method
Spectrometer adjustment method
rb 043 2020
rb t 14
rb/t 089
rb/t028-2020
rb/t063-2020


Introduction

Analysis of the core content of the standard

Method type Applicable scenarios Adjustment coefficient Data requirements
Simple reaction adjustment method Stable performance equipment α=0.11, β=0.61 ≥3 consecutive calibration data
Incremental reaction adjustment method Mathematical modeling equipment required Dynamic calculation Historical calibration trend
Periodic verification method Standard equipment for verification - Verification records ≥ 6 times

Key technical points

Initial cycle determination factors

According to the requirements of Chapter 5 of the standard, the initial cycle of new equipment should be comprehensively evaluated: manufacturer recommendations, frequency of use, environmental factors and other 12 key indicators, among which 3 equal blocks and other metrological standards need to pay special attention to the accumulation of historical data.

Cycle adjustment risk control

Clause 6.1.2 of the standard clearly requires the establishment of a double threshold mechanism: when the error exceeds MPE80%, the cycle review is triggered, and when it exceeds 100%, the cycle must be shortened immediately and the previous test data must be traced back.


Implementation suggestions

  1. Establish a hierarchical management system for equipment, and implement shorter monitoring cycles for key equipment such as M1-level weights
  2. Develop an intelligent analysis system for calibration data to automatically calculate the reaction adjustment coefficient
  3. Periodic verification should cover the key points of the full range of equipment to avoid the risk of "false negatives"

Analysis of standard evolution

This standard implements the concept of "risk-based calibration cycle" in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 for the first time. Compared with the old version, it adds periodic verification results and equipment maintenance records as the statutory basis for adjustment, reflecting the modern metrological concept of "data-driven decision-making".

Sample only — not a preview of RB/T 034-2020
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend