Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
material pipeline inspection methods previous inspection data high-risk pipeline sections gas pipeline pipeline lines risk assessment evaluation dimensions pipeline short distance vegetables scopethis standard applies duck fertilization rate
SY/T 6714-2020 in English

SY/T 6714-2020 in English

VALID

Approach for oil&gas pipeline risk-based inspection

  • Issued on:2020-10-23
  • Implemented on:2021-02-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $250.00
$243.00
Standard No: SY/T 6714-2020
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Approach for oil&gas pipeline risk-based inspection
Title in Chinese: 油气管道基于风险的检测方法
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2020-10-23
Implemented on: 2021-02-01
Superseding: SY/T 6714-2008 Risk - Based inspection base resource document
Professional Classification: SY-Oil & Gas
Related Keywords: material pipeline inspection methods
previous inspection data high-risk pipeline sections
gas pipeline
pipeline lines
risk assessment evaluation dimensions pipeline
Related Topics: Oil and gas pipeline
risk
oil and gas
Oil and gas pipeline
Oil and Gas Pipeline Standards
sy/t6714
baseline risk
Five inspections of gas pipelines
Spectral-based detection methods
Spectral based detection method
risk detection
Sequencer-based detection
Airflow detection method
Airflow detection method
Exhaust gas detection method
Pipeline Inspection Pipeline
risk detection
About breath testing
oil and gas pipeline
risk criteria
risk in english
Key Risks in Testing
risk measurement method
CNPC risk
Based on water flow detection
risk measurement method
Methods of Detecting Oxygen
CNPC risk
Risks when testing
Detection method Oil
Oleic acid detection method
Crude oil detection method
Pipeline Inspection New
Special trachea detection
sy6714
Anything based on detection ability
base detection method
pipeline risk
A basic approach based on risk testing
Oil absorption detection method
Risk-based inspection methods for oil and gas pipelines
Chlorine gas detection method
Air duct lighting inspection standards
sy/t6714-2020
Pipe spectrum inspection
Detection method of pipe smoke temperature
trachea
sy/t 7494-2020
sy/t 7466-2020
sy/t 7468-2020


Introduction

Analysis of the core content of the standard

This standard replaces the SY/T 6714-2008 version, mainly adding specific detection methods for pipeline lines and station process pipelines, and strengthening the risk-oriented detection strategy. The technological evolution is reflected in: deleting the reference content of API 581 and establishing a localized detection system.


Comparison of three dimensions of risk assessment

Evaluation dimensions Pipeline routes Station process pipelines Method differences
Risk identification 6 types of pipe body defects 5 types of body anomalies Station adds stress concentration items
Detection cycle ≤5 years ≤8 years Station can be dynamically adjusted
Special pipe sections Geologically sensitive areas Vibration/non-flowing pipe sections Station yards need to pay attention to alternating loads

Key points for implementing detection methods

Typical application scenarios

Case 1: In the external corrosion detection of a long-distance pipeline, the AC potential gradient method + anti-corrosion layer electric spark detection combination scheme was adopted, and 3 anti-corrosion layer damage points were found. After excavation verification, the accuracy rate reached 92%.

Case 2: In the detection of circumferential weld defects at the station yard, the ultrasonic phased array technology detected crack defects larger than 2mm, which increased the detection efficiency by 40% compared with the traditional UT.


Suggestions for the implementation of the standard

  1. Establish a pipeline integrity management system to integrate previous inspection data
  2. High-risk pipeline sections should give priority to the use of a multi-dimensional internal inspection technology combination
  3. A dynamic risk assessment model
  4. should be established for station process pipelines
  5. Efficiency test indicators need to be included in the annual integrity evaluation report

Technology Development Outlook

With the maturity of electromagnetic ultrasonic testing (EMAT) and digital radiography (DR) technologies, future standards may add: ① Composite material pipeline inspection methods ② Artificial intelligence defect recognition specifications ③ Real-time monitoring data fusion requirements.

Sample only — not a preview of SY/T 6714-2020
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend