Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
seismic data reservoir prediction single reservoir prediction geophysical reservoir prediction introduction core changes fracture prediction prediction error 8-factor prediction headspace gas chromatography sh/t 0707-2001 laboratory mandatory approval requirements energy generation systems
SY/T 7002-2020 in English

SY/T 7002-2020 in English

VALID

Specifications for geophysical reservoir prediction

  • Issued on:2020-10-23
  • Implemented on:2021-02-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
Price(USD): $300.00
$291.00
Standard No: SY/T 7002-2020
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Specifications for geophysical reservoir prediction
Title in Chinese: 储层地球物理预测技术规范
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 5 business days
Issued on: 2020-10-23
Implemented on: 2021-02-01
Superseding: SY/T 7002-2014 Technical specifications for geophysical reservoir prediction
Professional Classification: SY-Oil & Gas
Related Keywords: seismic data reservoir prediction single reservoir prediction
geophysical reservoir prediction introduction core changes
fracture prediction
prediction error
8-factor prediction
Related Topics: Geophysics
reservoir
predictive technology
sy/t 6238.1
predict
pre-test cs testing techniques
technical management
reserve
reservoir
Geophysics
predictive technology
layer earth
prediction and detection
Jurassic Geophysics
to predict
Reservoir prediction industry
sy/t 7494-2020
sy/t 7466-2020
sy/t 7468-2020


Introduction

Core changes in the standard revision

Technical modules Contents of the 2014 version Additions/modifications in the 2020 version
Definition of terms 5 basic terms 5 new terms such as spiral gathers and azimuthal anisotropic intensity
Data collection 4 types of basic data 11 specific requirements for seismic data
Reservoir prediction Single reservoir prediction Expanded to 8-factor prediction (lithology/physical properties/oil and gas content, etc.)

Key technology implementation points

1. Seismic rock physics modeling

It is necessary to establish a rock physics model including parameters such as P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density, and make the prediction error ≤15% by optimizing the ratio of soft and hard pores (recommended range 0.2-0.8). Quality control needs to provide:

  • Measured vs predicted elastic parameter cross plot
  • Sensitive parameter histogram analysis report

2. Azimuthal anisotropy analysis

Added a double verification mechanism of ellipse fitting method and azimuthal statistics method:

Method Applicable scenarios Accuracy requirements
Ellipse fitting method Continuous fracture development area Main azimuth angle deviation≤10°
Azimuthal statistics method Discrete fracture development area Azimuthal interval≤30°

Quality Control System

Implement a three-level inspection system:

  1. First-level inspection: 100% self-inspection by the special group
  2. Second-level inspection: 30% spot check by the project group
  3. Third-level inspection: 20% key inspection by the competent department

Key quality control indicators include: reservoir calibration phase error (≤1/2 phase), well consistency of inversion results (≥90%), consistency between fracture prediction and logging interpretation, etc.

Sample only — not a preview of SY/T 7002-2020
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend