Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
high-energy laser beam quality evaluation laser beam quality high energy laser beam introduction in-depth interpretation beam quality beam quality characteristics neutralization titration salvage technology scopethis standard preservation management
GB/T 32831-2016 in English

GB/T 32831-2016 in English

VALID

Quality Evaluation and Testing Method of High Energy Laser Beam

  • Issued on:2016-08-29
  • Implemented on:2017-03-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 1~3 business days
Price(USD): $220.00
$214.00
Standard No: GB/T 32831-2016
Document status: VALID
Title in English: Quality Evaluation and Testing Method of High Energy Laser Beam
Title in Chinese: 高能激光光束质量评价与测试方法
Language: English
File Format: Electronic (PDF)
Delivery: Via email within 1~3 business days
Issued on: 2016-08-29
Implemented on: 2017-03-01
ICS Classification: 31.260-Optoelectronics. Laser equipment
Chinese Classification: L51-Laser device
Professional Classification: GB-National Standard
Related Keywords: high-energy laser beam quality evaluation
laser beam quality
high energy laser beam introduction in-depth interpretation
beam quality
beam quality characteristics
Related Topics: high energy light source
laser mass spectrometry
Quality Evaluation
high energy beam
Laser beam
bundle
High Quality Spectral Measurements
Fiber High Energy Laser
Laser Pipe Measurement
laser beam
Fluorescence excitation spectrum with
Valence test method
laser light
Laser Measurement Tool
Temperament high energy
Quality Evaluation
High Performance Spectrum
High Performance Spectrum
Laser and Fluorescence
Laser Measurement Tool
beam light
Fluorescence and laser
Laser Beam Application
high acid value
Laser Energy and Wavelength
hundred beams of light
Flow laser and channel
microbeam method
alaser
beam spectrum
two beams of light
Bundle
Laser Pipe Measurement
GBT32831
GB/T 32831-2016
Beam quality factor beta
Laser alignment method measurement template
High energy laser system beam quality
Laser particle size testing method
Laser high and low temperature testing
Evaluation of spectral quality
Evaluate luminescence reagents
Laser spectrometer measurement method
Several methods of beam quality measurement
Evaluation Method of Matrix Effect of Quality Control Products

《GB/T 32831-2016高能激光光束质量评价与测试方法》由TC284(全国光辐射安全和激光设备标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为中国机械工业联合会。


Introduction

In-depth interpretation of high-energy laser beam quality evaluation and test methods

Standard dimensions Technical requirements Scope of application Comparative analysis
β factor It is used to evaluate the ratio of the far-field divergence angle of the beam to the diffraction limit angle of the reference beam. The formula is:
$$ \beta = \frac{\Theta_{u, \mathrm{real}}}{\Theta_{u, \mathrm{ref}}} $$
It is applicable to the case where the far-field beam width is greater than the width corresponding to the diffraction limit angle. The index calculation is simple and intuitive, but it is not sensitive to non-rotationally symmetric transmission characteristics.
BQ factor The square root of the ratio of the power ratio of the reference beam to the measured beam in the barrel within the diffraction limit angle. The formula is:
$$ \mathrm{BQ} = \sqrt{\frac{u_{\mathrm{ref}}}{u_{\mathrm{real}}}} $$
Applicable to the case where the far-field beam width is close to the width corresponding to the diffraction limit angle. It can reflect the uniformity of the beam energy distribution, but the calculation complexity is relatively high.
BPF factor The ratio of the power ratio of the measured beam to the circular reference beam in the barrel within the diffraction limit angle. The formula is:
$$ \mathrm{BPF} = \frac{u_{\mathrm{real}}}{u_{\mathrm{ref}}} $$
Applicable to the test scenario of the circular reference beam. The calculation is simple, but the applicability to non-Gaussian beams is low.
M matrix Describes the transmission characteristics of the measured beam in the laboratory coordinate system, the formula is:
$$ = \frac{\pi^2}{16\lambda^2} \begin{bmatrix} d_{0x}^2 \cdot \Theta_x^2 & d_{0xy}^2 \cdot \Theta_{xy}^2 \\ d_{0xy}^2 \cdot \Theta_{xy}^2 & d_{0y}^2 \cdot \Theta_y^2 \end{bmatrix} $$
Applicable to the case where the measured beam has non-rotationally symmetric transmission characteristics. Can fully reflect the transmission characteristics of the beam, but the calculation complexity is the highest.

Practical Application Case Analysis

Case Background:A high-energy laser equipment manufacturer needs to test and optimize the laser beam quality.

Test Method Selection:Based on the characteristics of the equipment, two evaluation methods, BQ factor and M matrix, were selected. The BQ factor is used to evaluate the uniformity of the beam energy distribution, and the M matrix is used to analyze the transmission characteristics of the beam.

Test Results:The test results show that the BQ factor is 1.2, indicating that the beam energy distribution is uneven; the M matrix calculates the asymmetric transmission characteristics, indicating that the equipment needs to optimize the optical components to improve the beam quality.

Implementation Recommendations

  • Test Device Calibration:Ensure that the response wavelength, linear dynamic range, and effective light diameter of the test device meet the standard requirements.
  • Uncertainty assessment: Carry out uncertainty analysis on the test results according to the method specified in JJF1059.1-2012 to improve data reliability.
  • Multi-dimensional evaluation: Select appropriate evaluation factors (β, BQ, BPF or M matrix) according to the actual application scenario to ensure that the beam quality characteristics are fully reflected.
  • Technology evolution analysis: Pay attention to the latest developments in laser technology, regularly update test methods and standards, and maintain industry leadership.

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 32831-2016
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend