Sign In |Help & Support
ALL SECTORS
  • ALL SECTORS
  • GB(National Standard)
  • CB(Shipping)
  • CECS(Engineering Construction)
  • CJ(Urban Construction)
  • CY(News and Publication)
  • DB(Provincial Standard)
  • DL(Electricity & Power)
  • DZ(Geology & Mineralogy)
  • FZ(Spinning & Textile)
  • GA(Public Security)
  • HB(Aviation)
  • HG(Chemical Industry)
  • HJ(Environmental Protection)
  • JB(Machinery)
  • JC(Building Materials)
  • JG(Building & Construction)
  • JJ(Metering)
  • JT(Highway & Transportation)
  • LY(Forestry)
  • MT(Coal)
  • NB(Energy)
  • NY(Agriculture)
  • QB(Light Industry)
  • QC(Automobile & Vehicle)
  • QJ(Aerospace)
  • SH(Petrochemical)
  • SJ(Electronics)
  • SL(Water Resources)
  • SN(Commodity Inspection)
  • SY(Oil & Gas)
  • TB(Railway & Train)
  • YB(Ferrous Metallurgy)
  • YC(Tobacco)
  • YD(Telecommunication)
  • YY(Medical Device)
Database: 365,228(8 Aug 2026)
robot life cycle risk assessment methods introduction analysis risk assessment framework risk assessment results dynamic risk assessment 4-6 risk assessment implementation digital cellular mobile communications carthami flos scopethis document medicinal materia wuweizi scopethis document
GB/T 38642-2020 in English

GB/T 38642-2020 in English

VALID

Industrial robot life cycle risk assessment methods

  • Issued on:2020-04-28
  • Implemented on:2020-11-01
  • File Format:PDF
  • Delivery:Via email within 5 business days
Price(USD): $630.00
$612.00

《GB/T 38642-2020工业机器人生命周期风险评价方法》由TC591(全国机器人标准化技术委员会)归口,主管部门为中国机械工业联合会。


Introduction

Analysis of the core content of the standard

This standard establishes a risk assessment framework covering the entire life cycle of industrial robots, including transportation, installation and commissioning, operation and maintenance, and adopts a three-step iterative method to achieve risk control:

  1. Intrinsically safe design measures
  2. Configuration of safety protection devices
  3. Use information warning

Definition of key terms

Terms Definition Application scenarios
Contact area Robot's maximum motion space coverage area Robot arm working radius range
Safety protection space Safety area defined by protective devices Range defined by fences/light grids
PLr level Control system safety performance level Corresponding risk index level 4-6

Risk assessment implementation process

The 8-step assessment procedure specified in Chapter 5 of the standard:

  1. Determine the evaluation object (robot body/AGV)
  2. Establish a cross-disciplinary assessment team
  3. Collect technical parameters and usage scenarios
  4. Divide life cycle stages and hazardous areas
  5. Use risk graph method (SFOA) for assessment
  6. Prepare a risk assessment report
  7. Implement risk reduction measures
  8. Verify residual risk

Typical application case:

The risk index of a articular robot during the debugging phase was 5 (S2-F1-O3-A2), which was reduced to 2 (S2-F1-O1-A1) by adding a teach pendant emergency stop button and a safety light curtain.


Key points for hazard identification

Appendix A/B lists in detail the 137 hazards, which are mainly distributed in:

  • Mechanical hazards (accounting for 62%): extrusion, shearing, collision
  • Electrical hazards (18%): electric shock, short circuit
  • Thermal hazards (12%): scalds, fire
  • Human factors (8%): misoperation, insufficient training

Examples of special risk scenarios:
The collision risk of AGV in the blind spot of turning (Appendix B-36 items) requires additional protection by laser scanners.


Technology Evolution and Standard Comparison

The main improvements of this standard compared with GB/T15706-2012:

Dimensions GB/T38642-2020 GB/T15706-2012
Coverage Specialized robot life cycle General mechanical equipment
Risk quantification Clearly define the correspondence between risk index and PLr/SIL level Qualitative description only
Hazard source identification Provide a robot-specific checklist General checklist

Implementation suggestions

  1. Establish a robot safety file and record the risk assessment results at each stage
  2. Conduct a dynamic risk assessment on the AGV navigation path
  3. Regularly verify the PLr level of the safety control system
  4. Formulate enterprise implementation rules in combination with the case in Appendix C

Note:System integration risks need to be evaluated separately with reference to GB11291.2.

Sample only — not a preview of GB/T 38642-2020
Page: 1 / 0
100%

Loading PDF document...

Error loading PDF. Please make sure the file is valid and try again.

We also recommend